Happy International Women's Day!

It's finally here, the day you've all been waiting for, 

International Women's Day!

     My first instinct, which I promptly acted upon, was to overwhelm my social media networks with information about the holiday:  pictures, videos, articles, songs, the whole shebang.  I wanted to make sure that no one could miss this day.  That no one I knew would go through March 8th, 2013 without recognizing the value and validity of women in their lives and society.

     My second impulse was to critically analyze the holiday - it's origins, events, and intentions.  International Women's Day began in 1911, and it was "International" because women in four different European countries participated.  Over time, the phenomenon grew to include women in countries literally all over the globe.  Women, and those who love women, celebrate this holiday on every continent in the world.

     However, this international participation is likely to paint an over-utopic picture of the day.  As I have been looking at news articles, blogs, and even social network posts, the Eurocentrism of 'International' Women's Day is evident.  One example, is an article on CNN by Melinda Gates.  Her opening is powerful, but as one reads on, it is clear that her lens is extremely hierarchical.  She sees Europe and the USA as the top promoters of gender equality, and consistently and exclusively uses the "developing world" for examples of "social norms that prevent women from realizing their full potential."

    This is not to say that there are not issues in countries other than the US and Europe.  However, she, and most other writers on this subject, are European or from the US and forget to look at their own societies' injustices, inequalities, and violence (physical, psychological, and symbolic) against women. Few mention that, although the Violence Against Women Act was passed, several influential Bishops opposed the bill because of its inclusion of LGBTQ women.

     One source that I thought was doing it right was the MSN Causes page and their slideshow of top images of women this year.  The photos range from Malala Yousafzai and protesters in India to Sandra Fluke and Licia Ronzulli.  They include devastation and optimism, activism and daily life.  These are the women of the world.  Diverse, capable, and taking action.

From Pioneers to Regressives – What happened to Womanpower in the Midwest?

I am a Nebraskan – bred, born, and raised.

The Heartland is my homeland, and I know what the state welcome sign means when it says:

“NEBRASKA … the good life.”

     In Friedan’s The Feminine Mystique, she draws a parallel between the “strong capable women…needed to pioneer our new land” in the age of Manifest Destiny and those needed on “the American frontiers…of the mind, and of the spirit” in 1963.  Though this connection is far from crucial to her main premise, it ‘hit home’ with me because of my personal history in the heart of the Midwest.

     When the United States began its Westward expansion, women were crucial in the process.  In order to make permanent their establishments, communities and ‘civilization,’ as well as people, had to be spread to the West.  Unlike the exploration parties and single men who came before, women brought stability.  Women were the ones who created farms, ranches, churches, schools, and everything else that American society demanded.  As Friedan points out, “these women were respected and self-respecting members of a society,” and “independence, responsibility and self-confidence, self-discipline and courage, freedom and equality were part of the American character for both men and women.”  This was not only true during the first wave of settlers, but it continued on as the territories became communities, towns, cities, and states.  During the ‘First Wave’ feminist movement, the West ‘pioneered’ the right to vote.  Even universities, like the University of Nebraska, were coeducational from the beginning.

     With this history of women’s empowerment and inclusion so early on, it would seem that the Midwest ought to have advanced further than most other places in the U.S.  At the least, they should be on par with some of the most gender-progressive places.  Alas, this is not the case.  Contrary to their gender-inclusive history.  States in the Midwest, especially the "Heartland," have some of the most gender-regressive policies in the U.S.  From reproductive autonomy to work-family policy, the Midwest is lagging behind the rest of the country.  Most recently (yesterday), when the House of Congress voted to pass the new, inclusive, Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) all of my Nebraskan representatives voted No.

     How is it that the states which led the way for women to redefine themselves and femininity itself are now restricting their women to the most confining roles possible?  Where did the regressive strain in Midwestern politics come from?  And how can we reassert the independence, strength, and innovation of Midwestern women?

-----

As a post-script note:  I would like to explicitly acknowledge that this perspective is Europeanist: the very things that made the pioneering women ‘strong’ and ‘progressive’ were done to the detriment of Native peoples.  (The lands that my ancestors colonized belonged to the Pawnee, Ponca, and Omaha.)  I wish that I could address this issue from an inclusive perspective, but my knowledge of indigenous peoples – their histories and realities – is only just beginning, and my analysis would likely do more harm than justice.  If you want a brief, but insightful, article on Native American feminism, this is at least a start at unpacking the complexity.  Hopefully in the future I will know more and be able to fully explore the issue while radically checking my white, colonizer privilege.