In her chapter "The Class
Culture Gap," Joan C. Williams addresses the oft-ignored, but
ever-important, differing expectations and values between the Missing Middle
class (median incomes of $35,000 to $55,000) and the Professional-Managerial
class (median income of $125,000 - the top 15% of U.S. households). One
of the major differences that Williams describes is the
Professional-Managerial’s focus on their children’s self-actualization versus
the Missing Middle’s focus on their children’s self-regulation.
A consequence and cause of these
expectations is a difference in social and employment networks. Williams
claims that the Missing Middle is comprised of smaller and denser social
networks. These relationships, though fewer in number, are stronger in connection
and support - often different members of families reside within miles of each
other and talk daily. The members of these communities, whether familial
or not, depend on each other more heavily than do members of
Professional-Managerial communities. Professional-Managerial networks
tend to be broader and weaker. They know more people and have more
far-reaching connections, but those connections are less maintained and provide
fewer direct supports.
As a “second-generation”
Professional-Managerial class member, I am still expected by my Missing Middle
family to stay close to home, find a stable job, and be successful that way.
By my own Professional-Managerial expectations and peers I am expected to
go out into the world, discover my vocation and identity, and achieve
self-actualization. I am moving to Latin America next year, that is
decided, but I do feel conflicted about leaving my family. I cherish our tight bonds, even though I might not be as physically present in their maintenance. I wonder, do second or third generation class migrants ever fully leave their class background behind? Should we? Or is it better to combine the strengths of the two?
These questions are excellent. In her chapter "Coming to Class Consciousness" in /Why Class Matters/, bell hooks says that working class graduate students cannot fully enter academics without leaving the past behind. Her definition of working class is more traditional that Williams's Missing Middle, and her point is well demonstrated with her own story of entering academics. If belonging to family means being a certain person, and the academy changes that person, then can we still belong? For the second and third generation PM class migrants you describe, should we consider the role of social media in keeping people in touch? In contrast, many working class and working poor do not have home technology or internet access to enable evening chats or Skype. Discussing technology can add an interesting dimension. And thanks for the links to the program you'll be on next year. That's exciting. Congratulations.
ReplyDelete